Just look at the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200, ranks in at the top of class 2 on said to be only 15 percent behind the dedicated mid-range cards Geforce GT 650M, and GT 750M. But CPU`s now are dual, quad, or even eight core, with much more cache memory, and are able to do some graphics fairly decently. Integrated graphics are slower than dedicated graphics, back in the early 2000`s, shared memory graphics were a joke. Compared to the PS2 and Xbox versions, the graphics are far ahead on the not run it at 640x480 and max detail settings, its better to have more FPS then higher resolution, my current PC gets 60+FPS on 1024x768 and max settings, but I usually run the game at 640x480 and max detail settings, graphics are still very good without sacrificing FPS.
The Graphics at these settings are very sharp.
NFS U2 on my current Computer(AMD-A8) - 1024 x768 Maxxed Settings - 62 FPS w/Fraps The demo is still available, just search on google, try it out and see how it runs.ĪMD A8-5557m Quad Core 圆4 with 4 MB L2 Cache Windows Your Core i3 will run Underground 2 just fine. Intel Q35 - much slower than Intel HD 3000 I was recently playing Underground 2 on this: Geforce MX 4000 64MB - had no pixel shader support, only vertex shader and TnL - PCI(not express) 256 MB SD Ram 100 - that ram was clocked at 100mhz!!!!!!!! that's damn slow.
